The books are not in a ranked
order; instead, they represent a set of texts drawn from a fairly eclectic set
of disciplines. After adding a part II I will try to connect some of the common
themes.
*****************************************************************************
Katherine Boo’s Behind the Beautiful Forevers, has been justly praised and awarded for its stirring narrative of slum
living in Mumbai. It took 3 years of her
life to live this world and then some time to craft the prose into something
approaching art. If you have not been to India or you have not watched the documentaries
on how untold millions live, this book will let you in to a world we often do
not wish to admit does indeed exist. We just choose not to see it.
*****************************************************************************
Sam Harris’ Free Will, is
short but quickly devastating to your sense of self. If his thesis is correct,
that humans have no free will, then this book will be remembered in generations
to come, for sounding the death knell to what we thought we knew was ‘human
nature’. A number of well-regarded neuroscientists disagree that the data he
has gathered is conclusive, but it certainly makes a great case for changing
the justice system in the US.
*****************************************************************************
Mortality, by Christopher
Hitchens, not so much for the Vanity Fair articles that have been gathered here,
although they contain the great prose and heroic outlook that made his last
acts anything but a gentle goodnight; instead, this pick is in part for the body of work he
left behind in his many others books and articles. Contrarian, and perhaps the
raconteur supreme of his generation. What most moved me in the book, however,
is the last essay, written by his wife, Carol Blue. It is a devastatingly beautiful summary
of the better angel of Hitchen's nature and should be read by anyone who wants
to learn about love and life.
******************************************************************************
Trust Me, I'm Lying: Confessions of a Media Manipulator, by Ryan
Holiday is problematic in every sense of the word. For some, it might even fall
under the category of evil. This part tell all and part mea culpa is really a
how to book on creating a sensation via social media. The rules are clear and
they are completely amoral. To get ahead, says Holiday, lying and manufacturing
stories is the way to fame and possibly fortune. He gives morally wrong examples that brought him wealth and
fame and only then sort of says he's sorry. But he also sort of gleefully revels in the bad
boy he is. But as a how to book it is undeniably helpful. Whether readers want
to bite this apple of knowledge is a moral question worthy of discussion. And I
have had them with others when working on projects. So far I have not bitten the apple but temptation is tough to resist.
*******************************************************************************
Lionel Asbo State of England, by bad boy Martin Amis, is one I would recommend to be listened to rather than
read. Alex Jennings, the Audible.com narrator captures the demotic poetry of the seamier side of London. Amis has learned and then shared the hard fricatives of Lionel and his nasty, brutish, and short-lived
ilk while somehow making the lout an object d'art while simultaneously demonstrating how his values actually
transcend class once money enters the scene.
Everyman arises. The plot is more of an attempt to teach an object
lesson (in all senses of the term), but the beauty of the words, low and spewed
and twisted, become a lovingly rendered prose poem in the midst of unprovoked
attacks, self-righteous stupidity, and motiveless malevolence. I would also suggest that Amis’ book be
served along with a reading of Theodore Dalrymple’s book, Life at the Bottom: The Worldview That Makes the Underclass (Published in 2003). That book begins by rewriting, with withering wit, Marx’s
opening salvo:
A SPECTRE IS haunting the Western world: the underclass. This underclass is not poor, at least by the standards that have prevailed throughout the great majority of human history. It exists, to a varying degree, in all Western societies. Like every other social class, it has benefited enormously from the vast general increase in wealth of the past hundred years. In certain respects, indeed, it enjoys amenities and comforts that would have made a Roman emperor or an absolute monarch gasp. Nor is it politically oppressed: it fears neither to speak its mind nor the midnight knock on the door. Yet its existence is wretched nonetheless, with a special wretchedness that is peculiarly its own.
Dalrymple is not a sympathetic ear to some of the plights of the poor. Politically correct he is not. And neither is Amis for some quite similar and quite different reasons. In both cases they give a view of the world that exists but is little talked about in either way in polite company.
A SPECTRE IS haunting the Western world: the underclass. This underclass is not poor, at least by the standards that have prevailed throughout the great majority of human history. It exists, to a varying degree, in all Western societies. Like every other social class, it has benefited enormously from the vast general increase in wealth of the past hundred years. In certain respects, indeed, it enjoys amenities and comforts that would have made a Roman emperor or an absolute monarch gasp. Nor is it politically oppressed: it fears neither to speak its mind nor the midnight knock on the door. Yet its existence is wretched nonetheless, with a special wretchedness that is peculiarly its own.
Dalrymple is not a sympathetic ear to some of the plights of the poor. Politically correct he is not. And neither is Amis for some quite similar and quite different reasons. In both cases they give a view of the world that exists but is little talked about in either way in polite company.
*****************************************************************************
****************************************************************************
![]() |
Lucretius |
A Universe From Nothing, Lawrence Krauss. I am not quite alone in
seeing the value of the book. Richard Dawkins gives it an afterward and says it
is game changing in its attempt to answer all those who say something cannot
come from nothing. I have talked with a world-renowned astronomist, and he,
like the moral philosopher who heaped scorn on it in the Times, thinks it may
not answer the question that may be said to be the foundation of all
philosophy. Maybe so. But he tries. And he may be prophetic (an ironic word
given his views of religion) or he may be unable to prove his point. On the
other hand, he asks us to understand that our fundamental assumptions about the
origins of space/time may not have needed a push. If subsequent astrophysicists
can back him up he will then be given the Nobel if he is still alive or statues
and accolades if not. In any case, he is not headed heavenward, but tries to
bring the heavens down to earth inside our conscious understanding of the
nature of things, an echo of De Rerum natura perhaps.
****************************************************************************
Engine Empire: Poems, Cathy Park Hong. If I had to think of an analogy
to this book of poems I would pick David Mitchells’ Cloud Atlas. Not the film,
but the book, in which the different eras call for different styles. Hong moves
from the founding of the American West to a future that is not wildly dystopian
but sad in its likely accuracy. She returns poetry to it roots in epic; rather
than stand-alone lyrics, she invokes images that permit us to share in a larger vision. The sequences form a whole and ask us to see across poems,
voices, and lines. By returning to the grand narratives of the past, she has renewed the call for poetry to be more than a block of print in a weekly or
monthly magazine. It participates in civic and poetic discourse and asks us to
think about the way words work to place us in worlds.
******************************************************************************
Try. Read. Write. These
are verbs and Constance Hale writes a wonderful book, Vex, hex, Smash, smooch: How Verbs Power Your Writing on how verbs are the gravitational center of the sentence. This book, along with her previous Sin and Syntax, are great primers for writers of any age. The title proves to be a set
of rubrics she uses to promote or dismiss good and bad prose:
Hex:
No to this
nonstarter: “Avoid passive constructions”
A hot of
experts rail against what they fuzzily call “passive constructions.” Sometimes
they mean we should avoid static verbs. Sometimes they mean we should banish he
passive voice. And sometimes they don’t even know what they mean…What do you
think Gabriel Garcia Marquez would have said to an editor who told him to change
the first sentence of One Hundred Years of Solitude? As translated by Gregory
Rabassa, it begins like this:
Many years
later, as he faced the firing squad, Colonel Aureliana Buendia
was to remember that distant afternoon when his father took him to
discover
ice.
Here, in
one of the great opening lines of literature, the passive construction captures
the infinite passivity of Buendia’s situation.
All I can add is class dismissed. Great examples, like this one,
and great sentences from her pen too. Even some without verbs.
******************************************************************************
![]() |
Popular Mechanics Contest |
Jack Hitt's Bunch of Amateurs: A Search for the American Character is an optimistic celebration of those of us who still believe that great
innovations, discoveries, and contributions must come with a certain kind of
degree after or before one’s name. Hitt lovingly details those who are often
shunned by society until they are proven right and then those writers and scientists
fall all over themselves to say they knew ‘it” or him or her all along and were
just waiting for the rest of the world to catch up. In basements, garages and
blogs, people are making changes in the world. Sometimes almost alone. If we
had listened to the guys in garages we would not have had the housing crash we
did (see Michael Lewis’ The Big Short to see the outsiders (one literally in
his garage) had it right, while the big guys at Goldman ignored, overlooked or
worse, simply buried the bodies, that then surfaced.)
Hitt writes great sentences.
While the word
Amateur may be complicated and full of contradictions, the American amateurs
that constantly pop up throughout our history are, basically, one of two kinds
of characters. They are either outsiders mustering at some fortress of
expertise hoping to scale the walls, or pioneers improvising in a frontier
where no professionals exist. If every country forms its national character at
the trauma of birth, then we are forever rebelling against the king or lighting
out for the territories.
This last sentence is not simply beautiful; it entices us to
follow Huck Finn and the others who shun the traditional to find the
undiscovered countries of the soul, the soil, or the universe.
No comments:
Post a Comment