In the midst of Meg Mitchell Moore’s novel The Admissions, Angela, a senior in a high-pressure
high school in a high-income neighborhood just outside San Francisco, runs a cross-country
race. We hear her labored breathing as she, whose life has been shaped by her
father, her school, her peer group, and the culture of Marin country, CA runs
beyond her limits to attempt to win the ultimate prize: no, it isn’t a gold
medal at the end of the race; instead, it’s a spot at Harvard.
Angela’s labored breathing gets worse with each step. She
struggles to keep up with the runners around her. This tortured sound serves as
a metaphor for those students now applying to the most selective colleges and
universities in the world. The race --one long exercise in pain and lack of
oxygen-- is just one of the recurring metaphors for the way the upper middle
class culture has embraced what Freud called “the death drive” as a response to
keeping up with the Stepfordesque neighbors in terms of schools, houses, jobs
etc. Which college one goes to what business one works for what neighborhood one
lives in all have life and death consequences. Or so some think.
This cross-country race, in addition to being a metaphor,
comes to us with specific details--the shape of a hair braid of the runner in
front of Angela-- the braid bounces in front of her and the readers' eyes in close
up. The way teens talk just before the
gun goes off has the glibly bland flatness of real dialogue. For those who like
details, carefully chosen and woven into the tapestry of each chapter, they
will not be disappointed by the descriptions throughout the book. The author
is, to be sure, talented in crafting a plot and giving us the details that make
the multiple storylines move along. We are drawn in and care about the fates of
Angelica, her family and friends.
Overall, there are very few flat characters. One intern who
will resort to almost anything to gain a job is an exception, but almost all
the others are, at some level, civil, urbane, and generous and far more ethically
rooted than the family whose unraveling we get to peek in on and then get to
enjoy the often excruciatingly detailed self-flagellations that come afterward.
One “character” that has, if not a
starring role, then at least a best supporting one, is The Golden Gate Bridge.
I won’t spoil why the bridge shows up throughout the book except to say it is
also a symbol of something that has great beauty but also has a dark side too.
Ms. Moore has talent, no doubt about it. The plot is tightly
woven, a bit like the hair braid that Angela sees as she runs her race. Each
chapter has an arc and each of the plot lines unfolds logically but also with
some useful misdirection so that we as readers are surprised by some of the
things that happen by the end. The book
has the edges and shadows of a tragedy—how kids’ lives are in danger given all
that they go through to get into top colleges, but ultimately the book is a
comedy of manners.
As the book unfolds we gradually begin to understand that
the title refers not simply to the admission process that Angela must endure as
she and some of her friends apply to Harvard. The subtitle could well have been
Crimes and Misdemeanors. Ultimately, the admissions refers to confessions that
characters must make for transgressing the bounds of what is ethical or at
times legal. The book has a moral arc that fiction must have if it is to appeal
to its targeted audience—those hyper stressed students applying to elite schools,
the moms and dads pushing the kids to go to these schools and all the educators
and others who have been keeping up with stories coming out almost weekly on
how bad these kids have it who hope to get in to schools that turn down 95% of
those who apply.
I hope I have made it clear that the book is a good read. Several
people who have read the novel have posed the question to me that I want to
answer here. How accurate is the portrayal of the stress that kids are under
who attend secondary schools in communities composed of successful professionals?
In other words, does the author get it right when talking about what these kids
and families are going through?
Ms. Moore does underscore the stress in ways that many would
say are accurate. To give just one example, Julie Lithcott Haimes’ book, How To Raise an Adult, has, as its
thesis, the critique of the unhealthy approach that parents in these kinds of communities take
to raising children:
I understand that the systemic problem of overparenting is rooted in our worries about the world and about how our children will be successful in it without us. Still, we’re doing harm. For our kids’ sakes, and also for our own, we need to stop parenting from fear and bring a more healthy— a more wisely loving— approach back into our communities, schools, and homes.
Julie Lythcott-Haims. How to Raise an Adult: Break Free of the Overparenting Trap and Prepare Your Kid for Success. Henry Holt and Co.
This book, a Cri du Coeur, might well serve as the non-fiction bookend to The Admissions. Lythcott-Haims has children ienrolled in Gunn High School, the school that many of the Mountain View companies in California send their children to. It has a record for getting students in to great colleges but it also has a record for students falling apart, or worse. The cover story in the most recent issue of The Atlantic focuses on student suicides at Gunn. "The Silicon Valley Suicides Why are so many kids with bright prospects killing themselves in Palo Alto?" (Full disclosure: Julie and I are part of a podcast put out by Slate called Getting In. Julie hosts the show and I contribute commentary on the state of admission as it exists today. She and I agree that there is far too much emphasis on name rather than fit).
The Admissions shows just how far certain people are willing to go to try to get into top schools. It also shows what some students think or do when their dreams of Ivy don’t work out. The intersection of fact and fiction, of life imitating art and art imitating life, underscores how parents around the US and the world as well, may be hurting the way their children navigate their way through the world. The Admissions does this without making it too much of a novel based on a moral although the center of the book's ethical core does ask us to judge parents who sell their souls for looking good to others They need a personality and maybe even a geographical adjustment.
I understand that the systemic problem of overparenting is rooted in our worries about the world and about how our children will be successful in it without us. Still, we’re doing harm. For our kids’ sakes, and also for our own, we need to stop parenting from fear and bring a more healthy— a more wisely loving— approach back into our communities, schools, and homes.
Julie Lythcott-Haims. How to Raise an Adult: Break Free of the Overparenting Trap and Prepare Your Kid for Success. Henry Holt and Co.
This book, a Cri du Coeur, might well serve as the non-fiction bookend to The Admissions. Lythcott-Haims has children ienrolled in Gunn High School, the school that many of the Mountain View companies in California send their children to. It has a record for getting students in to great colleges but it also has a record for students falling apart, or worse. The cover story in the most recent issue of The Atlantic focuses on student suicides at Gunn. "The Silicon Valley Suicides Why are so many kids with bright prospects killing themselves in Palo Alto?" (Full disclosure: Julie and I are part of a podcast put out by Slate called Getting In. Julie hosts the show and I contribute commentary on the state of admission as it exists today. She and I agree that there is far too much emphasis on name rather than fit).
The Admissions shows just how far certain people are willing to go to try to get into top schools. It also shows what some students think or do when their dreams of Ivy don’t work out. The intersection of fact and fiction, of life imitating art and art imitating life, underscores how parents around the US and the world as well, may be hurting the way their children navigate their way through the world. The Admissions does this without making it too much of a novel based on a moral although the center of the book's ethical core does ask us to judge parents who sell their souls for looking good to others They need a personality and maybe even a geographical adjustment.
While I laud Ms. Moore for writing a readable novel about the stress
that pervades the tony neighborhoods around the country, I also have to point
out that she really does not know how bad it is for kids who expect to
get in to places like Harvard. I am not trying to be an alarmist or make things
more stressful for those who read this, but the author simply has the parents
and students in this book miss stuff that no self-respecting Ivy fixated group would. I believe that Ms. Moore actually misleads
readers about what students need to do to get accepted at the most elite
schools. It is not that she is hyperbolic about everything that Angela and her
family should think and do; actually, she does not have Angela do the things
virtually any student applying to Harvard from a community she is in would do.
I will give just a few examples. Angela seems unaware that her
friends are paying big money for SAT prep until the topic comes up in the fall of
her senior year. A kid with a Harvard obsessed dad and a school of Ivy hopefuls
would all know the best prep programs for SAT, ACT, SAT 2 and AP courses start in 11th grade or earlier. No matter how smart the students are parents in these communities often will enroll students at these kinds of prep programs if they think it will help
their children's chances. The family is also clueless when it comes to college counseling.
They do not obtain the services of an independent consultant something many
in these communities do, and they act as though it is a huge surprise that some
of Angela’s friends are doing this. It also comes as a surprise to the parents
that drug use is all too common at the
school. The drug I am referring to is not weed, although I am sure there is a
pretty fair amount of kids that get high in schools like this; instead, it’s
Adderall, the study drug of choice among high school and college students, especially during exam periods.
To portray parents who are Ivy obsessed but also clueless
about many of these issues seems to fail my test of a willing suspension of disbelief. It is also
unfortunate that we do not see the whole list of schools Angela is applying to.
In the book it appears she has applied to almost nowhere else except Harvard.
No kid would do this today. The kids today see the previous group of seniors,
the stars of the school, get dinged at top schools. Watching the top student
not get in is one of the lessons kids learn from as they embark down the dark
tunnel of admission. The college counselor in the book underscores the competitive
landscape, but the father simply dismisses it and the mother does not really
seem to care all that much about it. This too strains credulity.
Finally, anyone who has been showing off his Harvard alum
status for as long as the father does in the book would at least at some point
play the name game once a week with someone who knew someone when he was a
college student. The alum status would also get him an unending stream of mail
from the schools asking for money and letting him know how his fellow student
have done since leaving. In other words, the dad should be showing everyone his
Harvard stuff in more ways than he does. Angela's talk with a Harvard admission Dean also stretches things a bit far, but I won't say much else about this, as it it still a good scene within the scope of a fictional world.
The non-fiction world
students live in, to sum up, is even more tightly wound than Ms Moore seems to
know. In an interview Ms. Moore said the book came out of a year spent on the
West Coast with her family. Her children are young and so she did not actually
get to hear how obsessed everyone really is at a place like Gunn, except second hand. Her kids were not old enough to be
in the mix. For those who have had
students go through the process in recent years, I am not sure you will think
that the author got it right when she
tries to tell it like it is. And yet, despite all that, the moral of the book
still dovetails with what Julie says in her book too. There is far too much
pressure on kids and far too much parental involvement in making sure their
children do not have negative outcomes of any sort. But challenges are endemic
to living and some of the students, the real ones applying this year, are not
well-prepared for the emotional turmoil from not having their dreams come true
about the school they wish to attend. The
Admissions takes us close to the edge of what is happening but it also
gives us a chance to back away and see there are things far more important than
Harvard.
you need to find out as what we do as it needs to be one of our personal writing sides in this site http://www.personalstatementpsychology.com/the-niceties-of-forensic-psychology-personal-statement/ and choose between them then best one.
ReplyDeleteThere have so many ghost writers you will found who would work in such a way that no one can get their working way. So you will find one in here http://www.reactionpaper.net/about-writing-a-reaction-paper/ in ghost writing side.
ReplyDelete