A great writer, Pico Iyer, in an essay on St Patrick's Cathedral, talks about the ways in which human nature has changed rapidly in the last century:
Giant figures are talking and strutting and singing on enormous screens above me, and someone is chattering away on the mini-screen in the cab from which I just stepped. Nine people at this street corner are shouting into thin air, wearing wires around their chins and jabbing at the screens in their hands. One teenager, I read recently, sent 300,000 text messages in a month—or 10 a minute for every minute of her waking day, assuming that she was awake 16 hours a day. There are more cell phones than people on the planet now, almost (ten mobiles for every one at the beginning of the century). Even by the end of the past century, the average human being in a country such as ours saw as many images in a day as a Victorian inhaled in a lifetime.
No, why?
---
1. Students being on the "cutting edge" shouldn't necessarily be rewarded. This could be due to their parents' wealth rather than their personal abilities.
2. Quora is one of many similar sites. Universities should not discriminate based on the choice of website.
3. Quora is not necessarily the future. I don't really see a difference between Quora and Yahoo Answers. The main difference is the community, which has nothing to do with the website itself.
4. Colleges do not have enough time to carefully browse the answers for every student. Generally, colleges only spend ~30 minutes per student.
5. Allowing colleges to see your Quora posts means that you must filter your answers with that in mind. For example, I would no longer be able to post controversial answers or questions (see my answer history for some examples).
---
1. Students being on the "cutting edge" shouldn't necessarily be rewarded. This could be due to their parents' wealth rather than their personal abilities.
2. Quora is one of many similar sites. Universities should not discriminate based on the choice of website.
3. Quora is not necessarily the future. I don't really see a difference between Quora and Yahoo Answers. The main difference is the community, which has nothing to do with the website itself.
4. Colleges do not have enough time to carefully browse the answers for every student. Generally, colleges only spend ~30 minutes per student.
5. Allowing colleges to see your Quora posts means that you must filter your answers with that in mind. For example, I would no longer be able to post controversial answers or questions (see my answer history for some examples).
Dan,
Thank you again for taking the time to reply. I will try to be quick too. That rarely happens even if my intentions are good, so forgive me if I ramble.
I. The article you sent: "Internet access in Africa: empirical evidence from Kenya and Nigeria", covers a very specific group of people in the world. It is sad and true that so many there do not have access to computers. I know some people who are trying to help but it is an overwhelming task. On the other hand, the people this article refers to have nothing, it is sad to say, with the demographic I am referring to. In other words, the people who apply to highly selective schools from around the world are almost all, highly educated. Virtually none of the people who are referred to in this article have even the slightest chance of being admitted to a highly selective school. Given that this is the case, should schools not use information that is likely to be available to the vast majority of their applicant pool. This certainly is not fair in a global sense but all but 10 of the top schools in the US use the ability to pay as a major factor in selecting those international students who are offered admission. This is not fair either but the economics of the day at schools make this is necessity.
II. You are certainly correct about inner cities, but not quite as correct as you are in number 1. First off, a drug dealer's chances of being admitted to a highly selective school are again astronomically small. The meth labs that go up at places like MIT are often rich kids surprisingly enough. It’s a kick rather than an economic decision.
On the other hand, there are many foundations, from Gates to Questbridge to specific university centered programs that provide tutoring, computers, and college advice for free. Those tiny few who can make it through such terrible circumstances are often the most recruited students at Yale, Harvard and Princeton. I say this having read applications for many years as a part of the Ron Brown Scholar program. These are students from all across the US who are given scholarships to attend any school they choose. The winners are kids whose life stories would put any of us in tears. My tears have stained applications for this program for years, but hey are tears of joy and sadness. They are the lucky few who have found that education is the key to escape the cycle of poverty. All too often it is the quick fix, like drug dealing, that prevents students from choosing the long term path. If a student works hard in a terrible environment, and does well, they will get a full paid education at the best schools in the country.
V. As for risks, again you may well be right. In a cost benefit analysis it is likely in one's best interest to play it safe. On the other hand, those who have risen above and beyond what people like me can do or have done, are often the ones who did indeed have the guts to take immense risks. People like Steve jobs and many other billionaires did no get where they are playing it safe. There are mountains of books and data that demonstrate that risk takers and entrepreneurs and innovators are the 1% who really matte in the world. It is not their money but their passion and ability to get normal folks like me to follow who inspire global change. When I read an application of someone like that I take more than 30 minutes. I write them personally and tell them that wherever they go, to keep on pushing and experimenting. I don't care where they go to school; I care that they know there are people out there rooting for them. Even if they don't get into any Ivy, it does not matter. Their willingness to go all in is what at least to me we don't have enough of today. Our politicians are proof of this. Nothing happens that is not painstaking pushed through focus groups. They are unwilling to take a risk and make tough choices. Where I come from Jefferson has deity status. He put his life on the line, died virtually penniless, and did a lot of controversial things (some would condemn the Louisiana Purchase even today). But history pretty much has borne out he did a great service to his country and the world. The Declaration is a revolutionary document. Had he and others played it safe we might have very different accents than the ones we have now.
Thank you again for your time and words. I have learned much.
Thank you again for taking the time to reply. I will try to be quick too. That rarely happens even if my intentions are good, so forgive me if I ramble.
I. The article you sent: "Internet access in Africa: empirical evidence from Kenya and Nigeria", covers a very specific group of people in the world. It is sad and true that so many there do not have access to computers. I know some people who are trying to help but it is an overwhelming task. On the other hand, the people this article refers to have nothing, it is sad to say, with the demographic I am referring to. In other words, the people who apply to highly selective schools from around the world are almost all, highly educated. Virtually none of the people who are referred to in this article have even the slightest chance of being admitted to a highly selective school. Given that this is the case, should schools not use information that is likely to be available to the vast majority of their applicant pool. This certainly is not fair in a global sense but all but 10 of the top schools in the US use the ability to pay as a major factor in selecting those international students who are offered admission. This is not fair either but the economics of the day at schools make this is necessity.
II. You are certainly correct about inner cities, but not quite as correct as you are in number 1. First off, a drug dealer's chances of being admitted to a highly selective school are again astronomically small. The meth labs that go up at places like MIT are often rich kids surprisingly enough. It’s a kick rather than an economic decision.
On the other hand, there are many foundations, from Gates to Questbridge to specific university centered programs that provide tutoring, computers, and college advice for free. Those tiny few who can make it through such terrible circumstances are often the most recruited students at Yale, Harvard and Princeton. I say this having read applications for many years as a part of the Ron Brown Scholar program. These are students from all across the US who are given scholarships to attend any school they choose. The winners are kids whose life stories would put any of us in tears. My tears have stained applications for this program for years, but hey are tears of joy and sadness. They are the lucky few who have found that education is the key to escape the cycle of poverty. All too often it is the quick fix, like drug dealing, that prevents students from choosing the long term path. If a student works hard in a terrible environment, and does well, they will get a full paid education at the best schools in the country.
V. As for risks, again you may well be right. In a cost benefit analysis it is likely in one's best interest to play it safe. On the other hand, those who have risen above and beyond what people like me can do or have done, are often the ones who did indeed have the guts to take immense risks. People like Steve jobs and many other billionaires did no get where they are playing it safe. There are mountains of books and data that demonstrate that risk takers and entrepreneurs and innovators are the 1% who really matte in the world. It is not their money but their passion and ability to get normal folks like me to follow who inspire global change. When I read an application of someone like that I take more than 30 minutes. I write them personally and tell them that wherever they go, to keep on pushing and experimenting. I don't care where they go to school; I care that they know there are people out there rooting for them. Even if they don't get into any Ivy, it does not matter. Their willingness to go all in is what at least to me we don't have enough of today. Our politicians are proof of this. Nothing happens that is not painstaking pushed through focus groups. They are unwilling to take a risk and make tough choices. Where I come from Jefferson has deity status. He put his life on the line, died virtually penniless, and did a lot of controversial things (some would condemn the Louisiana Purchase even today). But history pretty much has borne out he did a great service to his country and the world. The Declaration is a revolutionary document. Had he and others played it safe we might have very different accents than the ones we have now.
Thank you again for your time and words. I have learned much.


No comments:
Post a Comment